Supsindex

We believe founders deserve to understand themselves before asking the world to believe in them. Supsindex was built to make that understanding measurable—not through another generic quiz, but through a scientific, verified assessment that turns your entrepreneurial profile into something you can actually learn from. If you're curious about what your Entrepreneurial Passport might reveal, this is a good time to find out.

Proud to see Supsindex launch on Fazier! As an Industry Ambassador, I believe startup ecosystems need to assess not only the venture, but also the founder behind it. Supsindex brings structured, evidence-based insight into founder readiness, decision-making, resilience, and ecosystem awareness. Excited to see more founders and ecosystem professionals discover this new standard.

this is very good realy

This is a genuinely fresh angle on founder readiness — evaluating the person behind the deck is exactly what most investors say is missing. The 200+ indicator structure sounds impressively thorough. Curious how you keep the assessments unbiased across different industries and cultures?

The investor-conversation use case is the strongest part: a structured profile is more useful in that meeting than a self-written founder story. One suggestion: let founders export the assessment as a shareable PDF they control, since they will be asked for it repeatedly during a raise and will want to know who saw it.

I like the idea of evaluating founder readiness beyond the pitch deck. The Entrepreneurial Passport feels like a useful way to identify blind spots before fundraising. I'm curious whether founders can retake the assessments over time to measure improvement and track their progress as they build their startup.

The idea of evaluating founder readiness beyond the pitch deck and pitch makes your product stand out buddy

The structured assessments and 200+ indicators sound like a useful way to turn founder readiness into actionable feedback. I like the focus on surfacing blind spots before investor conversations.

This is such a smart angle — most founder tools focus on the pitch deck or the idea, but the founder's own blind spots are usually what actually sink things later. The three-assessment structure (FPA/GEB/EEA) is a nice touch too, feels more rigorous than a generic personality quiz. Curious how the industry-specific part works — does the assessment change meaningfully across sectors, or is it more like a weighting on top of the same core indicators? Also building something myself right now, so genuinely interested in how you're thinking about the verification step for report validity.

I think you have a great product idea, try some founder subreddits for marketing.

good product i have used it saved my time

good product i have used it saved my time

The structured assessments and 200+ indicators sound like a useful way to turn founder readiness into actionable feedback before investor conversations.

Interesting angle — most tools score the deck, not the founder. The 200+ indicator assessment sounds thorough, but as a founder I'd want to know how long the three assessments take end-to-end and whether the Entrepreneurial Passport can be shared with investors as a verified link rather than a PDF. Also curious how you handle sector fit for founders switching industries — does the EEA adapt, or is it fixed to the sector chosen at signup? The identity verification step is a smart touch for credibility.

The focus on evaluating founder readiness across concrete indicators is a useful framing beyond a typical pitch deck. I especially like the idea of surfacing blind spots before investor conversations—how do you help founders turn the assessment into a prioritized action plan?

Really like the "verified founder identity, report validity" angle here, that's the part that usually gets skipped in most founder-assessment tools. A lot of self-assessment products end up being whatever the founder wants to believe about themselves, so building in verification against that is a genuinely different approach. The blind-spot detection piece is probably the most valuable part in practice. Founders are usually decent at listing their strengths unprompted but need real structure to surface the stuff they're avoiding or don't see. Curious how the 200+ indicators handle something like decision-making under pressure, is that self-reported through the assessment, or does it also draw on any external behavioral signal?

The focus on assessing founders beyond the pitch deck is thoughtful; the structured indicators could help teams spot gaps before investor conversations.

Nice Tool, Very helpfull

sounds like a promissing idea, keep it up

The distinction between the pitch deck and founder readiness is useful—especially the 200+ indicators. A helpful next step would be a shareable “top 3 gaps” action plan after each assessment, so founders can show investors the progress they made between conversations.