Rejectless

I'm Thejus , and I built Rejectless because every resume tool I tried lied to me politely. They'd hand back a score — "82/100, ATS-optimized" — and a green checkmark, and I'd still get rejected. None of them told me the actual problem: half my bullets were things I couldn't defend in an interview. "Improved system performance" — by how much? "Led a team" — to do what? That's the stuff that sinks you, and a score will never surface it. So Rejectless does the opposite. It reads your resume line by line and flags every bullet you can't back up — vague scope, missing numbers, unverifiable claims — then makes you fix it or cut it. No rewrites (the rewrite that matters is the one you can actually speak to), no vanity score, no ATS theater. There's also a builder on the Jake's template if you're starting from scratch. If you've ever looked at your own resume and quietly known a few lines were nonsense, this is for you. I'd love feedback, especially the harsh kind. Tear into it.

good tool <a href="https://smartblockblastsolver.com/">smart </a>

This is exactly what the resume space needed — not another "score out of 100" tool, but actual line-by-line feedback that tells you WHY a bullet fails and HOW to fix it. The Truth-based tailoring approach is a game changer. Most AI resume tools just hallucinate achievements. The fact that you capture real job requirements via a Chrome extension and then ask the user to fill the gap honestly? That's building with integrity. The content vault idea is underrated too — most people rewrite the same bullets from memory every time. Storing them by domain is a huge time saver. Genuinely impressed. Rooting for this one

great tool! congrats on the launch

Very cool product and concept

Flagging the bullets you can't defend in an interview is far more useful than another ATS score. Does it suggest what evidence to add, or just mark the weak lines?

Line-by-line linting with severity ratings is a smart approach — most resume tools give you a vague score and leave you guessing. The "truth based tailoring" angle is also refreshing, no inflated claims is exactly what candidates need.

The line-by-line approach is the right call. Most resume tools rewrite everything and hide the problem forcing you to defend each bullet or cut it is more honest. Curious how it handles senior engineers where ownership is genuinely shared across teams.

Finally, a resume tool that actually acts like a senior engineer doing a code review. Love that it focuses on line-by-line 'linting' and cutting the fluff rather than just throwing a random ATS score at you. Having Jake's template built-in without dealing with LaTeX is a huge bonus.

very great tool! much appreciated!

amazing tool very informative and helpful

The "can you defend this bullet in an interview" framing is clever - that is the real test, not some ATS score. Most resume tools optimize for robots, this one optimizes for the actual conversation. The content vault for reusing bullets across tailored versions is a nice touch too.

The interview-defend framing is the right lens — "can you back this up in a conversation" is the actual test, not ATS parsing. I do B2B enterprise sales and I've reviewed a lot of senior CVs where the scope problem is subtle: the bullet is technically true but describes a team outcome rather than personal contribution. Really curious whether the linter catches that specific pattern — shared ownership language where individual impact is buried. The content vault is underrated too. Most people rebuild from scratch every time and regress to the generic version.

"flags the bullets you can't actually defend" is the best one-line pitch i've seen for a resume tool. as someone who has reviewed engineering resumes, the vague-scope and missing-metrics bullets are exactly what gets people cut, and no ats-score gimmick fixes that. i also respect that it refuses to rewrite for you, forcing the person to fix or cut their own claims is what makes the result survivable in an actual interview. building on jake's template is a smart default too, engineers argue about resume formats way too much when the content is what's broken.

The line-by-line linting with severity ratings is a game changer. Instead of vague overall scores, you get concrete feedback on specific weaknesses. Truth-based tailoring that won't invent achievements is gold - no more generic buzzwords getting you auto-rejected. The free plan with no signup is smart for building trust before the Pro tier.

This is the kind of startup I like seeing. Wishing you and your team plenty of growth. If hiring becomes a challenge, check out Axisure. We connect startups with equity-based talent. axisure.xyz

Nice work. Good product

This is an amazing tool with line-by-line feedback that gives each severity rating + fix.

Really impressive! Love it!

Congratulations on your launch, Ill go checkout my own resume!