RealMarketAPI

Hi everyone 👋 I’ve been building my first SaaS for the past 2 months. No viral growth—just steady progress. Learning dev + marketing at the same time has been challenging, but really rewarding. Still early, but excited for what’s ahead.

Hey, the product is super solid, but just a genuine question as a trader is that, what is the max latency that i can expect and what is the average latency? Because what I trade is high frequency.

Really useful for anyone building trading tools or bots. The developer friendly REST API approach makes sense, most market data providers make integration unnecessarily complicated. Would be great to know more about the uptime SLA and how you handle rate limiting at scale.

I think that this is quite a good idea and alot of people will and SHOULD use it!

Hey, the product is super solid, but just a genuine question as a trader is that, what is the max latency that i can expect and what is the average latency? Because what I trade is high frequency.

It is Quite a good idea

I think that this is quite a good idea and alot of people will and SHOULD use it!

Makes sense in the agentic era

Hi, I am really not into trades, but I am just moved by your zeal to keep pushing because giving up is not an option. I wish you all the best.

The multi-asset coverage (Forex, Crypto, Commodities) in a single REST API is a big plus — most developers end up stitching together multiple data providers which creates reliability headaches. One thing I'd love to see documented is the WebSocket reconnect behavior during brief network drops, since trading bots need to handle that gracefully. Have you considered adding a sandbox/test mode with simulated tick data for developers to test against before going live?

amazing product!!! asijdnasasijohasdhiosdhiosa

Really impressive to see tick-level price feeds with WebSocket support — that's exactly what algo traders need for low-latency strategies. The multi-asset coverage (Forex, Crypto, Commodities) in one API is a big plus. Would love to know if there are rate limits on the free tier and whether historical OHLCV data is on the roadmap?

The freemium approach here is smart — giving developers access to real-time data without upfront cost lowers the barrier to integration significantly. One thing I'd love to see: WebSocket support for streaming prices so bots don't need to poll. Would be a huge differentiator for HFT use cases. The latency question from the other comment is key — if you can publish SLA benchmarks that would go a long way for production adoption.

the product is great

This is a good idea and I will use it

The biggest advantage here is the focus on low-latency infrastructure rather than just “financial data access.” A lot of APIs offer market feeds, but reliability during volatility is what actually determines whether traders can build on top of it confidently. The tick-level updates and multi-asset support also make this more interesting for real-time dashboards and automated systems where delayed or inconsistent data can completely break decision-making.

this is great deal, product is solid.

This is a good product and I will use it

Really interesting space — real-time market data infrastructure is harder than it looks. The latency question from 0xprinc is the right one. For HFT the difference between 5ms and 50ms is the entire business model. Publishing p95 latency benchmarks (not just averages) would answer that faster than any sales conversation. The multi-asset coverage in a single REST API is genuinely useful — stitching together multiple providers creates reconciliation headaches that compound under volatility. One thing worth considering: WebSocket reconnect behaviour during network drops is where most trading integrations break in production. If you can document the reconnect contract clearly, bot developers will trust the infrastructure faster. Good luck with the launch — steady progress beats viral every time.

Really interesting space — real-time market data infrastructure is harder than it looks. The latency question from 0xprinc is the right one. For HFT the difference between 5ms and 50ms is the entire business model. Publishing p95 latency benchmarks (not just averages) would answer that faster than any sales conversation. The multi-asset coverage in a single REST API is genuinely useful — stitching together multiple providers creates reconciliation headaches that compound under volatility. One thing worth considering: WebSocket reconnect behaviour during network drops is where most trading integrations break in production. If you can document the reconnect contract clearly, bot developers will trust the infrastructure faster. Good luck with the launch — steady progress beats viral every time.