Local account switching for Chrome, without the cloud.
4.8(6)29ProductivityPrivacyExtensions
LoginFlip saves named login-state snapshots for the same website, so people can move between work, test, client, and personal accounts with fewer sign-outs and repeated logins. Snapshots remain in Chrome on the user’s device; there is no LoginFlip account, developer backend, cloud sync, analytics, ads, or tracking. LoginFlip is a sequential switcher rather than a multi-container browser, and it never stores passwords.
Save named local login-state snapshots
Pin and reorder frequently used accounts
Keyboard shortcuts for the first four entries
Return to the previously active account
Passphrase-encrypted selective export and import
No product account, backend, cloud sync, analytics, ads, or tracking
Switch between work, test, client, and personal accounts on the same site
Reduce repeated sign-outs during QA and support work
Keep login snapshots local while moving selected accounts between devices with encrypted backups
67 people supporting this launch
4.8
6 ratings
developer
AI video with native sound, paid per clip. Nothing stored.
A calmer Mac menu bar, one click away.
Enterprise Software. Intelligent Automation. Global Impact.
Comments
29developer
LoginFlip started from a boring routine: I kept logging out of the same site just to switch between work, test and personal accounts. Existing approaches were either heavier than I wanted or involved syncing session data somewhere else. So I built a small Chrome extension that saves named login snapshots locally and restores one when needed. It intentionally isn't a multi-container or password manager; it's a sequential switcher, and some sites with expiring or SSO sessions will still ask you to log in again. I'd love feedback on the UX and which sites handle snapshot switching well or poorly.
developer
LoginFlip started from a boring routine: I kept logging out of the same site just to switch between work, test and personal accounts. Existing approaches were either heavier than I wanted or involved syncing session data somewhere else. So I built a small Chrome extension that saves named login snapshots locally and restores one when needed. It intentionally isn't a multi-container or password manager; it's a sequential switcher, and some sites with expiring or SSO sessions will still ask you to log in again. I'd love feedback on the UX and which sites handle snapshot switching well or poorly.
returning to the previously active account is a smart detail for qa work. would be handy to show which snapshot is active right on the toolbar icon, like a small colored badge per account.
developer
Thanks — this is a useful suggestion. The popup currently highlights the selected account, but the toolbar icon does not persistently show it. A small privacy-preserving badge or color could reduce wrong-account actions, as long as it does not expose account names or imply an expired session is still valid. I’ve added this to the UX backlog.
Product manager at EarDub, a Chrome extension that dubs YouTube videos into your own language with AI voices.
Keeping the snapshots local and never touching passwords makes this a lot easier to trust than switchers that sync session data. For QA work, named snapshots like 'free plan' and 'expired trial' would save a lot of incognito-window juggling. One question: does a snapshot include localStorage and IndexedDB, or only cookies? Some apps keep part of the session outside cookies, which might explain why certain sites still ask you to log in again after a switch.
developer
Great question. A snapshot includes applicable cookies and localStorage for the exact website origin. It does not include IndexedDB, sessionStorage, Cache Storage, device-bound keys, or server-side authentication state, so some sites may still require sign-in again. LoginFlip does not read password fields, but session data can contain sensitive tokens and therefore stays local.
Keeping login-state snapshots entirely in Chrome with passphrase-encrypted selective export is a smart privacy choice for QA and support people juggling test accounts. How do you handle sites where the session also lives in localStorage or IndexedDB rather than just cookies? A small per-site indicator showing whether a snapshot restored cleanly would help users trust the switch.
developer
Current snapshots restore applicable cookies and localStorage for the exact origin, but not IndexedDB. LoginFlip verifies the browser-side writes and offers recovery when that step fails, but it cannot guarantee that the site’s server will accept the restored session until the page responds. A per-site restore-status indicator is a strong suggestion and would make that distinction clearer.
Mac developer. Building Command Reopen.
The sequential switcher is the useful part for QA: named local snapshots for work, test, and client accounts, without a cloud account or password store. Shortcuts for the first four entries plus return-to-previous cover the loop I actually do. One question before I would trust it on SSO apps: if a snapshot only restores cookies and the site keeps the session in localStorage, is the failed switch shown clearly, or does it look like it worked until the next request?
developer
LoginFlip restores localStorage as well as applicable cookies. If the browser-side write or cleanup step fails, the switch is reported as failed and recovery is offered. If those writes succeed but the server later rejects an expired, SSO, or device-bound session, it may initially look successful until the next request. That server-side boundary is worth making more visible.
I am Prince Jindal, who post about AI on @PrinceJindalAI on Instagram and YouTube.
Good to know about your website
software development freelancer
Timely tool — deepfake detection is becoming a real need for everyone publishing or trusting video online. From a creator's side, the key question is false-positive rate: legitimate edited/AI-dubbed videos (like multilingual dubbing) shouldn't get flagged as fakes. Does Sealed Rose give a confidence score or just a binary verdict, and how does it hold up against lightly edited but authentic footage? Would also love to know if there's an API for batch-checking. Watching this closely.
Product enthusiast and builder.
How does LoginFlip handle cookies for sites that bind sessions to IP or detect rapid account switching? A per-profile "last active" indicator in the picker would help catch stale sessions before they fail.
developer
LoginFlip cannot bypass IP binding, rapid-switch detection, device verification, or other server-side risk controls. It restores the local snapshot, but the site may still invalidate or challenge it. The picker currently shows when a snapshot was saved, not a true server-validated ‘last active’ time; distinguishing those two states is a useful suggestion.
Keeping snapshots local with no backend or cloud sync is a refreshing design choice, and never storing passwords makes it much easier to trust. For QA use, how does it handle sites that bind sessions to other state like localStorage or IndexedDB, or only cookies? That would decide whether it works cleanly on modern SPAs.
Software developer
Keeping everything local with no backend or cloud sync is exactly the right call for a tool handling login state — it makes LoginFlip much easier to trust than cloud-based session managers. Curious how snapshots behave when a site changes its cookie format between sessions: do users need to re-capture, or is there a way to refresh an existing snapshot?
developer
Snapshots can become stale when a site changes its cookies or the session expires. When a known account is active before switching away, LoginFlip refreshes its saved snapshot automatically. If the session is already invalid, the user can sign in again and use ‘Sign in again & update’ to replace that account’s snapshot. It does not try to rewrite incompatible or revoked tokens.
Programmer, webdev and father.
For QA work, a persistent label showing the active snapshot would help prevent changes in the wrong client account. Does LoginFlip warn before switching if the current tab contains an unsaved form, or does restoring a snapshot immediately reload the page?
developer
Important edge case. LoginFlip does not inspect forms or add its own unsaved-change warning today. Applying a snapshot reloads the target page; a site may show its native beforeunload prompt, but that is controlled by the site and is not guaranteed. Users should save form work before switching, and a pre-switch reminder or guard is worth considering.
This solves a real pain point for anyone juggling client accounts on the same site — logging out and back in all day is a quiet productivity killer. The passphrase-encrypted selective export is a smart touch for moving between devices without trusting a cloud backend with session state. One suggestion: a small persistent indicator of which snapshot is currently active would help avoid acting in the wrong account. Keeping everything local with no tracking makes this an easy tool to trust.
developer
Thanks for the concrete suggestion. The current account is highlighted inside the popup, but there is no persistent toolbar indicator yet. A neutral state or color badge—without exposing an account name—could help prevent wrong-account actions while avoiding false confidence when a session has expired.
The local-only approach is exactly the right call for a tool handling login states — no cloud sync means nothing sensitive ever leaves the browser. Named snapshots plus keyboard shortcuts would make juggling work, test, and client accounts much smoother during QA. Well thought out!
yes
Pinning and returning to previous snapshots seems especially useful for short QA loops. Since it is a sequential switcher, showing the active snapshot prominently before navigation would reduce the risk of changing the wrong account. The passphrase-encrypted export makes the local-first design more flexible without requiring an online account.
Founder
Definitely going to try this!
Keeping account switching local instead of syncing through the cloud is a real differentiator, especially for anyone juggling multiple client logins in one browser. The thing that would earn my trust: does it isolate cookies and storage per profile, or just swap the saved credentials? That distinction is what decides whether sessions actually stay separate.
Local-only session snapshots are a genuinely good design choice. I've juggled work, client, and personal accounts on the same sites for years and Chrome's built-in profile switching always felt clunky for this. One question: does restoring a snapshot fully isolate cookies and storage from other snapshots, so sites can't detect parallel sessions? Also curious whether the passphrase-encrypted export works cross-platform between Mac and Windows.
Handy for QA with several test accounts on one site. Sites that tie a session to a device or IP may reject a restored snapshot, so a small 'this snapshot no longer works' hint would save some confusion.
I build a Chrome tab manager, so my first thought was about open tabs. If I have three tabs of the same site open across two windows and switch snapshots, do all of them reload into the new account, or only the active one? A tab left showing the old account while the cookies now belong to another one seems like the easiest way to act in the wrong account.