Find a co-founder for your project easily with krooko!
66 people supporting this launch
4.8
6 ratings
Founder of krooko.me
AI video with native sound, paid per clip. Nothing stored.
A calmer Mac menu bar, one click away.
Enterprise Software. Intelligent Automation. Global Impact.
Comments
23A focused co-founder matching product could be valuable for turning an early idea into a real project. I like the straightforward positioning around finding the right partner—especially for solo builders looking for complementary skills.
Building eWorld Live — denser boards for curious tech, weird-web, and AI news.
The co-founder matching angle is compelling. How do you handle compatibility signals like shared commitment, complementary skills, and time zones without making discovery feel like a long form? A lightweight project brief plus a small trial could be a useful next step.
Hey
Great idea, projects get off the ground so much faster with a cofounder.
Best Salesforce Implementation Partner
good product i have used it saved my time
Best Salesforce Implementation Partner
good product i have used it saved my time
A focused way to find a co-founder around a specific idea—matching on project fit could make early collaboration much easier.
Finding the right co-founder is often harder than validating the idea, so the partner-oriented positioning is compelling. The social-media category also makes sense for discovery—what signals do you use to improve founder-project fit beyond shared interests?
Independent prop firm payout tracker
The "post what you're working on and let the right people come to you" model is interesting because it flips the usual co-founder search dynamic, most platforms make you actively hunt through profiles, which tends to favor people who are good at networking rather than people who are good at building. Curious how you handle the trust/vetting side once two people actually connect, is there any structure for validating that someone's claimed skills or past work are real before they commit time to a project together? That's usually where co-founder matching falls apart in practice, the initial connection is easy, but figuring out if someone will actually follow through is the hard part.
Nice Tool, Very helpfull
sounds like a promissing idea, keep it up
Bro, what's the advantage of this over YC's cofounder matching site?
especially for solo builders looking
For co-founder matching, it would help to show whether a project is still actively looking, plus the expected weekly commitment before someone reaches out. Can founders mark a role as filled or pause applications? That could save both sides time compared with browsing stale project listings.
Founder of Play FORE — motion-controlled golf on iPhone.
The co-founder matching focus is interesting—how do you help founders assess complementary skills and working styles before committing? A structured fit signal could make the first conversation especially valuable.
good product i have used it saved my time
Krooko's card-based approach is a nice change from the usual co-founder matching. Instead of a résumé-style profile you get a feed of what people are actually building, which is a much better signal for whether someone is worth teaming up with. The free-forever positioning matters too, because most early-stage founders won't pay for a tool like this before they have anything real. The two things I'd want before relying on it: some signal of activity and commitment — response time or how far along each project actually is — so it doesn't fill up with dead profiles, and a way to filter by the kind of partner you need (technical, business, content) instead of scrolling the whole feed. Good starting point, worth watching how the community fills in.
Founder building tools for traders and indie hackers.
Finding the right co-founder is genuinely one of the hardest parts of building a startup — most people try to do it through warm intros or random Slack groups, which is hit or miss. Krooko's approach of making it structured and searchable makes a lot of sense. Would love to see filters for stage (idea vs. revenue) and preferred working style, since those tend to be the real make-or-break factors beyond just complementary skills.
The focus on matching around a specific idea is useful—shared context can make an early conversation much more productive than a generic networking pool. Do you plan to surface complementary skills or collaboration preferences in the match?
Partner discovery is usually full of cold outreach, so a matching-focused approach makes sense. Would be useful to see how it filters partners by company size or integration readiness. Bookmarking to test.
A great time-saving tool.