Upload a contract, NDA, lease, employment agreement, terms of service, or privacy policy, and you get back a structured plain-English breakdown.
You can ask follow-up questions about the document. Answers come from the document's own text, not from general knowledge about contracts.
ClearTerms accepts PDF, Word, plain text, HTML, and RTF files up to 50MB.
Documents are encrypted at rest and in transit, stored in private buckets with no public URLs, and never used to train any AI model.
Easy to use
For your legal documents
6 ratings
AI video with native sound, paid per clip. Nothing stored.
A calmer Mac menu bar, one click away.
Enterprise Software. Intelligent Automation. Global Impact.
Comments
3第一次听说这个产品，初步看起来还是很不错的
Plain-English contract review is something freelancers and small teams genuinely need — most people sign MSAs and NDAs without fully reading the fine print. A question for the maker: does ClearTerms track clause changes between document versions, e.g. when a client sends a revised MSA? That redline-diff capability is usually what makes legal tools sticky for ongoing relationships. Also curious how you handle state-specific enforceability nuances (like non-competes) in the plain-English summaries — that context would make the risk flags much more trustworthy.
Builder
The framing of "answers come from the document's own text, not general knowledge" is the right call and worth calling out more prominently — it's the difference between a tool people can actually rely on for something like a lease or NDA versus one that quietly hallucinates a clause that isn't there. One thing I'd be curious about: for documents that reference external statutes or standard terms (e.g. "as defined under the Indian Contract Act"), do you ground those citations against the actual legal text too, or just flag them as undefined? That's usually the hardest 20% in this space.