Accessibility testing that goes further
A11ytest.ai was born through frustration of testing being an afterhought. Built by a QA for development teams. The aim is to make it easier for accessibility issues to be part of your workflow rather than an extra on top. A11ytest.ai generates bug tickets for you and can transfer them into your ADO or Jira backlogs. As well as being part of your pipeline.
6 ratings
AI video with native sound, paid per clip. Nothing stored.
A calmer Mac menu bar, one click away.
Enterprise Software. Intelligent Automation. Global Impact.
Comments
7Accessibility is something many give too little focus. Its good to see more apps in this space being developed.
Building Exact Statement, a tool that converts bank statement PDFs into CSV and Excel for bookkeeping workflows.
It’s useful to see accessibility testing framed as part of the normal QA workflow instead of a separate compliance chore. The Jira/ADO handoff and CI scan support feel especially practical for engineering teams that want issues to land where work already happens. I’d be interested to know how you reduce noisy results on complex component-based apps so teams can focus on the most actionable fixes first.
Bringing a11y directly into the QA workflow (with Jira/ADO export) tackles the exact friction point that usually pushes accessibility to "later". Curious how the scanner handles SPAs with heavy dynamic content, async modals and client-side re-renders, since those are where traditional scanners tend to miss real issues.
Founder
This is exactly what dev teams need—accessibility finally built into the workflow, not an afterthought.
Accessibility testing that goes beyond a checkbox is a compelling promise. I like that the positioning is clear for teams who need actionable findings, not just generic compliance reports. Curious how you balance automated checks with developer workflow speed.
Im not entirely sure on the question. If a user integrates the CICD pipeline functionality it wouldn't have any affect on the speed of the developer workflow speed rather a couple of minutes wait in a pipeline than manually go through checks
Teams usually fail a11y not from missing one WCAG line but from regressions on every release. A workflow that runs in CI and maps failures to specific components (not just the URL) would be worth a paid tier if you can connect to Git providers.